UPSC-Relevant News Items
1. Surat Court Hears Plea Against 7-Year-Old Daughter's Jain Diksha, Raising Faith vs. Minor Rights Debate
Page: 3
Summary:
- • A Surat-based man has filed a petition in the Family Court seeking to stay the *diksha* (Jain renunciation) ceremony of his 7-year-old daughter, arguing minors cannot make life-altering decisions.
- • The case reignites the debate regarding the rights and capacity of minors to undertake stringent religious vows, following a similar stay granted by the same court on a 12-year-old boy’s renunciation in May.
- • The father's counsel contends that religious practices cannot violate the fundamental rights of a minor, who is legally incapable of giving valid consent for such a decision.
Additional Facts:
- • The Judiciary, primarily through Family Courts, acts as the institutional mechanism utilizing its *parens patriae* jurisdiction to balance Article 25 (Religious Freedom) against the fundamental rights (Article 21) and welfare of the minor.
- • A key precedent was set in 2016 when the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) halted the *diksha* of a minor, establishing that religious rights under Article 25 are subservient to child welfare protections guaranteed by the Constitution and the Juvenile Justice Act.
- • Further solidifying this stance, the Gujarat High Court (2018) intervened in another high-profile minor *diksha* case, affirming that the state's obligation to ensure mandatory education and protection under the Juvenile Justice Act takes precedence over religious practice claims.
Linkage with UPSC course: